Fatass Challenge Redux
First thing I want you to do is scroll down and look at the chart. Go ahead, I'll wait here.
Checked it out? Good. That chart is the "result" of the very first week of the new Challenge. Pretty impressive results for ol' Clash there, ain't it? I mean, 17 pounds in one week! However, I think a little history is in order for you, the unsuspecting spectator:
I await your reaction to this shocking turn of events. Dear readers of Pinback's Web Central: As you may have heard, there is a small controversy -- what you might call a "tempest in a teapot" -- concerning the Fatass Challenge. I am sorry it has come to this, and I'm especially sorry that you fine people have to endure this unfortunate dispute. My preference would have been to handle this quietly amongst gentlemen, but I guess that's not how things work around here. My mistake. The human body weighs different...weights at different times during the day. In my personal experience, the body weighs the least first thing in the morning (well, not first thing. First thing you need to, ah, "unburden" yourself). It weighs different amounts, in my experience, during the middle of the day and then again at the end of the day. And, again, in my experience, the difference between the values can be significant, on the order of five or six pounds. I have a few theories to explain this, but whatever the reason, the fact remains that you weigh the least you're going to weigh on any given day in the morning. Not wanting to take unfair advantage of this quirk of nature, I asked Ben a few days ago if using one's weight first thing in the morning was acceptable. "Sure, that's what I'm going to do," is the response I got back. Body weight also varies somewhat according to one's diet. Long-term habits will have large effects of course, but short-term habbits can also have effects. It's funny to think that what might have given birth to the entire Redux contest was the fact that, in one Friday night, I ate the following:
And over the course of the next two days, I finished off that pizza and also ate a ton of other stuff. I commented to Pinback about my excessive eating by way of a funny email between friends and, THEN, at this point, he proposed re-starting the contest. He knew I'd been stuffing my face the past couple of days. There's no unfair surprise here. So I weighed myself: 175. I was a little surprised to see the measure so high because I'd had been pretty steady at 170 in those days, but whatever. As it turned out, after that one weekend, I got my diet back under control. And I also continued the legitimate aggressive weight-loss program I'd been following SINCE JANUARY 2 and, guess what? I lost weight! I'm not going to apologize for it. Yes, my weight as measured at the begining of the contest was abnormally high, but my opponent was well aware of that fact. And, yes, my weight as measured this morning was abnormally low. If I got on the scale right now, I'm sure I'd weigh more than 158. But here again, this is not something that was unknown to my worthy opponent, and it is not something to which he objected. So I ask you, have I done wrong here? I freely admit that I took maximum advantage of the natural fluctuations in the weight of the human body. But I did so after fully discussing the matter with, and receiving clearance from, my worthy opponent. To me, the bottom line is this: When this contest was first proposed, I stood on the scale and weighed one hundred and seventy five pounds. This morning, I stood on the scale and weighed one hundred and fifty eight pounds. I think it's clear who won this contest. I suppose if you're "hyper competitive," as some have described Ben, you have to grasp at anything you can to explain failure. I thought it was a friendy wager is all. I guess that's what I get for caring a bit too much.
Now, in addition to the above aesthetically pleasing graphic, we're going to "kick it up a notch" for Redux by providing, for as long as we can stand it, a recount of our daily intake! I presume this feature will be used primarily by gamblers who are looking to get a wager down for the next week's result.
3/23/2002
Pinback: Well, here we are. Possibly the last day of joy and innocence left on this entire website. Let's try to enjoy it as much as we can. 4 oz beef jerky, 1 braeburn apple (best kind, by the way), 2 or 3 red plums (jury's still out), possibly 1 Texas red grapefruit, 3 Guinness Extra Stout ales, 2 Heineken lagers. Estimated calorie count: Who the hell cares, this whole competition is a travesty, as you shall soon find out.
Clash: 2 cups of coffee (with half-and-half), 2 two-for-a-dollar ($1) packs of peanuts, 6 Lagunitas Pils beers. And one heaping, helping load of shady, scandalous dishonesty.
3/22/2002
Pinback: 1 large grannysmith apple, 4 oz beef jerky, 1 Newcastle Brown Ale, 1 16 oz bag garden salad + "Extra Lite(TM)" Italian dressing, 1 baked salmon fillet. Estimated calorie count: 850
Clash: 1 Italian Combo sub, 1 small bag salt-and-vinegar Kettle-brand potato chips, 2 Reese's Peanut Butter Cups, 2 Corona Extra beers, 2 Anchor Steam beers. Estimated calorie count: 15,000
3/21/2002
Pinback: Well, while it's still fairly calm, we might as well keep up with this somewhat pointless routine. I do want to apologize once again for what's about to happen in here, by the way. I try to run a nice friendly place, but sometimes it just doesn't turn out that way. 4 oz beef jerky, 1 small gala apple, 1 8 oz bag "mescalin mix" salad + "Extra Lite(TM)" Italian dressing, 1 can Healthy Choice "Fiesta Chicken" soup + Chipotle Tabasco sauce. Estimated calories: 600
Clash: 1 bran muffin, 2 nonfat lattes, 1 turkey/bacon/lettuce/tomato sandwich, 3 homemade Tollhouse cookies, 5 Sierra Nevada Pale Ales.
3/20/2002
Pinback: 4 oz beef jerfy, 1 medium grannysmith apple, 1 8 oz bag "mescalin mix" salad + "Extra Lite(TM)" Italian dressing, 1 can Healthy Choice "Fiesta Chicken" soup + Chipotle Tabasco sauce, 2 "Wrigley's Doublemint(TM)"-brand sticks of gum. Estimated calories: 650
Clash: 1 bran muffin, 2 nonfat lattes (Jesus...), 1 very small piece of ahi tuna, 6 cheese "tortalonis", 1 salmon sandwich, 1 bottle primitivo Italian red wine.
3/19/2002
Pinback: 1 16 oz bag garden salad + "Extra Lite(TM)" Italian dressing, 1 can Healthy Choice "Zesty Gumbo" + Chipotle Tabasco sauce, 2 "Samuel Adams(TM)-brand" beers, some tic tacs, 1 Starlight-esque mint. Estimated calorie count: 600. Although I should say that during the first day of this diet (yesterday), I somehow managed to gain three pounds in one day, so I started the day at 205. I am guessing that this will go way down tomorrow, but it's somewhat unnerving to start a contest already five pounds in the hole. Or on my ass, as the case may be. But I'm not worried, because look at what this guy is chowing down:Clash: 2 nonfat lattes (he's from San Francisco, see...), 1 "Italian chicken" sandwich, 1 bag of salt and vinegar potato chips (kettle chips), 1 bottle Monte Verde Californian Syrah.
3/18/2002
Pinback: 4 oz beef jerky, 1 16 oz bag garden salad + "Extra Lite(TM)" Italian dressing, 1 small Gala apple, 1 can Healthy Choice "Zesty Gumbo" + Chipotle Tabasco sauce. Estimated calorie count: 650.Clash: 1 bran muffin, 1 pesto/cheese crepe, 2 homemade "Tollhouse(TM)" cookies, 4 "Budweiser(TM)"-brand beers. ("Some supermodel pussy" - Clash, but this is really inappropriate.)
1 (*) Yes, I realize that this is not scientifically accurate. Most of the weight I lost last year came out of my brain. Rule Change: The original Challenge specified that were I (Pinback) to reach my goal first, Clash would have an additional six weeks to match or exceed my progress, since at the time, I had started six weeks earlier than he. This rule is now officially, publicly rescinded, so let's hear no more about this. "I hope everyone here realizes that he's only making this unilateral change to the rules because I pointed out this problem for him. I do not accecpt this unconscionable revision to the rules of an ongoing contest, but, because I'm going to destroy him anyway, I won't make a big stink about it. But I reserve my right to do so at a later date." - Clash "Is Apocalypse Now Redux a 'continuation' of Apocalypse Now? No. It's an entirely different movie altogether." - Pinback "It's an entirely different movie." - Leslie Nielsen, Julie Haggarty
|
Home Intro Clash Satan BBS 3/00-10/01 1/99 7/97-1/98 3/97-4/97 9/94 Coasters
|